Sunday, December 29, 2024

Two Things About Today: 1) the Dylan Movie and 2) the Magic Bus

 



Image thanks to Alexas Fotos  of Pixabay

1. 

We (my husband and I) went to see the Dylan movie "Complete Unknown" tonight and it was good and we both loved it, though it left out so many details about events shown and many details out about his life and the lives of his inner circle. But the movie was already 2 hrs and 20 minutes (something like that) so unless they wanted a three hour movie or more in two parts I guess they had to skimp a bit. Amazing that the actor who played Dylan could actually perform Dylan's songs like that sounding so much like him. I would see it again. The folk music history tidbets were great and the movie was a lot about change (the times they are a-changin'), which is so totally overgeneralized and vague for me to say so. Everything--okay, okay, so ALMOST everything--okay, okay, so maybe just lots or several things, you decide--about it needs more detail, but it gives a good overview.

Back in the day in the Creative Writing program at BGSU, us poets would play Dylan albums and discuss poetry and guess who :Dylan, as a great poet/songwriter.

2.

Can you spot me under the bus? I was 'told on' today for something that never even happened, that was untrue, then gaslighted into being told that it was just a joke. I think we need a new emoticon of a face under the bus, and another one for a face under a gaslight. I just want some leftover Christmas cookies now. Preferably chocolate since it makes the brain feel so good.

Event #2 proves you can blog about most anything!

See, this blog began as two different posts on my fb page and then I merged them into a blog, the second point quite senseless in going with the movie except that they both happened in the same time (real time, not reel time) frame as the movie.


Friday, December 27, 2024

WHILE ON THE SUBJECT OF JUNG

 


I agree, I concur, I get it, all of the above.  We always read these quotes on social media about how "it's not you, it's them," and how "it's not your fault, they are just projecting.," and so on and so forth, but that is not possible, not logical, or else no one is ever at fault, or else we would have to say that every event is a self-projected illusion when it comes to cause and effect. If someone slams the door in my face, I might assume I made them made or else I might assume it was for no reason. However, maybe it was because the door foes not stay closed unless you slam it, so you slammed it as I left the porch. Then we uncover a logical pragmatic reason that has little to do with the psyche or unconscoous or who projected what on who. 

If I think it's never me and it's always the Other projecting, then I am never wrong, never do anything wrong for any wrong reason, etc. I think we all know that towlrd does not work that way. Jungians talk about spirituality a lot. But seldom do I hear them talk about spirituality insiofar as how it manifests and works as its modus operandi on earth through material law. That they rarely even come close tio, unless discussing the effects of a planetary movement on a given day upon the general atmosphere or a given astrological sign. JUngians come close at times in partial fulfillment of the law when they speak of "psychoid." Certain physical laws exist and some laws sometimes are broken, but seldom is gravity broken except through a fork temporarily flying through the air via telekinesis, for what is perhaps here a silly example but the quickest coming to mind. 

So I think in irder to not project anymore you really have to live close to your own unconscious and own it. Years of examining it or else just being lucky and gifted that way can help. Dreams are another way of access, if you study them. The longer you study them, like say, perhaps all your life (!), the better you will come to seeing your unconscious and your self and your unconscious self and how it then surfaces to your own surface consciousness. Is that possible? Yes it is: Jung says so in the quote above, and Jung knew the unconscious as none other.  

It is easy to follow Jung and understand his quotes, but harder to follow his directions for the work, whether spoken or unspoken, and when unspoken, following the modus operandi of the worlds (material, psychic, and in-between psychoid, and the otherworlds and between those worlds) making up the unas mundas and then your own modus opoerandi which is half autonomous (imo, and so to sperak) and half your own construct over the years of its making by you. 

And speaking of autonomous, it is my theory that this is one (and only one) explanation of what we call autonomous beings in dreams. To understand this concept of autonomous figures in dreams further, see the research dissertation of Nancy Galindo, who taught Dreamwork in Jungian and Archetypal Studies program at Pacifica Graduate Institute. If I find a link online, I will post it. She shared it with a class I took with her. 

Sunday, December 22, 2024

FROM MY NOTEBOOK: ON SYNCHRONICITY

 




(Image thanks to pb826 of Pixabay)

took these notes in a class on Synchronicity with Dr, Keiron LeGrice at Pacifica Graduate Institute and I put my own notes, ideas, and spin in my notes.  

On SYNCH:

How did it (the event) seem to be unusual? (A synchronous event seems unusual.)

Impossibility?

Improbability.

Animistic view of world--to me it seems as if the world psyche is speaking to me when it happens

It all speaks as if from "there" (whereever the inner world is, in the air?) to where we are now...

Evolution, where to go next?

Astronomical figure

synchronicty--a meaningful coincidence is the phrase coined by Jung

---personally meaningful plus archetypally meaningful--it will have archetypal meaning to your psyche

PRIMAL--> WORLD--> INDIVIDUAL CONSCIOUSNESS-->PARTICIPATION MYSTIQUE/ANIMISM: World pervaded by spirit. Sacred. However no clearly distinguishable substance. --> more to Judeo Christian in the West--world seen as God's creation, God as Spirit Creator. Post modern: the focus seems to be the individual consciousness and not the world consciousness anymore. Our own psyche becomes the focus of MEANING too and not the world's meaning, God's meaning, and so there is a lack of the world as seen as meningful. Focus away from animism and participation mystique of our psyches. Participation mystique (see Mircea Eliade) is defined as when yiou are so immersed in the environment and surroundings that you are a natural part of it and not aware of feeling separate from it. That is just one way to define it. So all meaning now that we regard anyways resides within the individual. 

 Friedrich Nietzsche  said, "God is dread!" Meaning that people did not believe anymore, as LeGrice explained it it is when the collective unconscious had its disconnect. The atmosphere changed, a new paradigm came. From Oxford Dictionary:

par·a·digm
/ˈperəˌdīm/
noun
  1. 1.
    a typical example or pattern of something; a model.
    "there is a new paradigm for public art in this country"
    Similar:
    model
    pattern
    example
    standard
    prototype
    archetype
    ideal
  2. 2.
    Linguistics
    a set of linguistic items that form mutually exclusive choices in particular syntactic roles.
    "English determiners form a paradigm: we can say “a book” or “his book” but not “a his book.”"

See, Foundations of Modern Identity--Charles Taylor.
-The modern age and how we move from Christian era into it. 
Our modern self-ego is buffered; we do not live in our enchanted world anymore. I find this sad. I find my escapism from that in books and folklore and film and music and art too. Some of it is so enchanting. We have "pourous boundaries shaping--or not shaping!--our lives" (--LeGrice, Personal Communication, PGI.)
boundary between agents and forces us porous in older enchanted world--the boundary between self and others was porous too as was between self and environment. If one of the tribe, you were operating with the others not seen as "Other: but as One. And now as said above we can compare this to how our focus of meaning is entirely within the individual. So, as LeGrice stated, "SO IN OUR WORLD SYNCHRONICITY IS NOT SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN!" (Embolden mine.) I see that in the Old World it was something that people experienced as a natural frequent occurance.

This older type of consciousness (I like to call it Old World Consciousness!) is what is called a sort of twilight consciousness. it has a brooding, humming mystique--
--See in Jung's book Four Archetypes, "abaisement du niveau," look up in index. (Originally, in the first place.)  MENTION OF DAVID rows??? GRIFFIN, have to look that up.

Personal ego
Personal unconscious and the collective unconscious

TO BE CONTINUED, SO MUCH MORE TO GO--




l


l


Saturday, December 21, 2024

Quick Note for Fiction and Folklore Stories: Why is 3 the Magic Number?


(Image thanks to FreeFunArt from Pixabay)

Q: Why is three the lucky number and so important in folktales and in magical tales? 

A: 

1)  Once is an event. 

2)  Twice is a coincidence.

3)  Three times is a pattern. Three is the uncanny number, the lucky number, the pattern can create the magic, the spell: Bibbidy, Bobbidy, Boo! Three magic words, or count to three or three pinches of salt, etc. 

Enboldened words above wre from a personal communication with Dr, Joel Rudinger, Folklorist and Professor Emeretis, Bowling Green State University Firelands. 

*

Notes re: #2: 

When two or more things in common happen at once, they happen simultaneously, such as the phone ringing just as you are thinking of someone and it is them. 

Jung called this synchronicity--it is acausal. It sppears to be a coincidence. TFolklore studies do not typically involve Jungian studies but Jungian  psychology studies do often include folklore and fairy tales.

Twice or more is a coincidence in time. It is a simultaneous psychic state between the physical world and the world psyche creating the first sign of psychoid events--the colelctive psyche or world psyche breaks out into the physical world of one or more people witnessing the event. Some religious visions experienced by a small to large crowd that is deemed a spiritual vision or spiritual experience may possibly come under this category of psychoid also, but is not necessarily synchronicity, though perhaps a coincidence. It would be a coincidence if at that moment the people in the crowd were talking about the same thing that the vision that came entailed. 

For a study in the above statements, read Death Dreams and Ghosts by Aniela Jaffe, with a forward by C. G. Jung, of whom she was a student. The book discusses such things that I just put my spin on above. 

All kinds of nuances to this, but in folklore/tales, the action/events are generally general (!), usually kept extremely simple, though I can think of a couple exceptions. In those exceptions, the action in the story is still told simply, but the resulting mental exercise created can become more complex when examining the curious meaning.  The exceptions are when the meaning can be mysterious, complex, sets our minds to pondering.  Another time, I will write about one of those exceptions. 


Friday, December 20, 2024

Some old notes to Harry Potter intro for children's literature class





                            Image thanks to MarvaMValentinaMancosu from Pixabay

At the holiday time, I see Harry Potter all over the movie channels as part of the holiday magic, along with others like Disney and Tolkien's Ring. So now I have Harry Potter on the mind. In a notebook, I came across some old notes I had written down for part of my lecture series for a children's literature class I taught (to adults--most students were adults majoring in education or literature, whereas some were parents who wanted to know about the books their children would read). 

Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone Intro

 Step One: ORDINARY

Our story begins with a mention of the Darsley's of 4 Privet Dr.

Privit sounds like privy or private. we will see they like to keep things private as they have privy to a bunch of information that is not "normal" so is hush-hush.

4 is considered to be, symbolically, a nice solid #--the four directions encomapss the earth, the 4 pillars or foundations, 4 walls making/enclosing a room. They are supposedly nice and "normal!" (Define symbol as a term.)

Mr. Darsley  makes drills at Grunnings firm, and is described as a big beefy man with barely any neck. You will see later that he does not have a neck to stick out for anyone  as the old saying goes: "He wouldn't stick his neck out to save anyone." He won't spend his energy on anyone else or risk criticism. He won't even discipline his own son who has bad behavior that he ignores--again, can't stick his neck out to deal with it. Can't be bothered with bothersome things. Old sayings like "stick your neck out" is called an adage, or a fixed expression, or sometimes a proverb.

Mrs. Darsley has an elongated neck that allows her to always look (laughingly to the reader) over the fence into the neighbor's yard. She is the opposite of Mr. Darsley. These two characteristics and social qualities (anti-social vs. nosey neightbor) are juxtaposed/compared and contrasted to one another as opposites so strong they take on a physical form (or symbolic form in the book). (Define juxtaposition as a literary term.) So, she is nosey.  (Remember the Robert Frost poem about how good fences make good neightbors?!)

These two are quite the characatures of themselves (define in class and discuss) Rather like a cartoon character of themselves. Artists do drawings of charicatures at festivals. It is an exaggeration of the qualities of the person/ality or person's physical features--here the no-neck and the elongated one.

Their dud of a son's name is Dudley/Their son is named Dudley and he is a dud. But they think he is the best son ever. You'll see how spoiled he is. 

It seems they have everything they want and THEN some--they have to bear a secret that cannot be exposed--Mrs. Darsley's sister was Mrs. Potter, Harry's mom. The Potters were not normal. They consider Mrs. Potter to have been a "good for nothing" along with her husband. They never wanted the Potters to go to their home and didn't want people to know about Harry later living with them, when he was orphaned. Even though they are related, the Darsley's do not claim the Potters. They keep Harry under the steps to hide him from everyone.

Keeping Harry in the tiny closet under the steps sets him up as a modern day male Cinderella. He has all the characteristics of a Cinderella story's main character: unfortunate child orphaned by at least one parent goes to live with stepfamily or relatives, treated poorly, hidden from the rest of the world, but then the Cinderella/Harry charcter has special qualities and magic comes to call them to a special event that changes their lives for a more happily ever after or for success. There are usually magical helpers/helper animals and supernatural events and  creatures/beings. 

Once all the sorcery magic breaks loose:

The atmosphere changes from "ordinary" to extraordinary and then even supernatural. The owl flying around as if directed by a magic spell or some act of enchantment to Harry's street then residence (it is!)  and the cat reading a map is not "normal" or "ordinary" and is magical/charmed, then the people dressed in cloaks (wizards and sorcerors) show up. Nor do nocturnal owls usually fly around well-populated areas in broad daylight, so it all is out of context to our reality as we know it. 

Mr. Darsley takes a work break to go to the bakery and hears the cloaked figures talking about the Potter's (Harry's parents who are deceased) and their son Harry, the Darsley's nephew. 

We find out a normal mortal who is non-magical  is called a "muggle." 

Mr. Darsley doesn't approve of the imagination. 

The same cat somes back. 

Once home, he greets Mrs. Darsley. 

Details, details: Dudley's new word he learns that day is "won't." 

The news broadcasts are about weird owls flying everywhere and shooting stars. 

Mrs. Darsley's name is Petunia. Let's discuss what this implies. How delicate is she really? Is she as sweet as a petunia?

The couple goes to bed, hoping it couldn't affect them. But the camera shows the cat still there like a statue (eerily), like a sentinel on watch, then a man appears around the corner who turns (pun intended, you turn a corner!) out to be Dumbledire, the cat becomes a woman who happens to be Prof. McGonagall from Hogwart's, and this is the first mention of shapeshifting. Define shapeshifting.

When the wind stirs up, the owls appear, the cat shows up, this is all called forshadowing, a literary device used to fortell the types of evens to come in the story. 

An introduction sets the tone and setting, points to things to come, and can involve foreshadowing, and often uses symbols to portray meaning, whether hidden or obvious meaning or states of things. Other settings in the story or places can be introducred later, too, such as going from Privot Drive to Hogwart's school. Of course, settings can change amidst a storyline. Main character often changes also--it is the hero of the story and it is the hero's journey, as termed by Joseph Campbell, mythologist. The journey changes the hero--our life experiences change us, and the more extraordinary ones change us most, usually. 

This is all from Chapter One. 

*

Now, we will move into Chapters Two and Three.

Step Two: CALL TO ADVENTURE

By now you can see I am patterning (identifying) the steps of Joseph Campbell's "The Hero's Journey." (This will be discussed further than in these notes. Pass out handout of Hero's Journey from online source.)

Discuss here the Hero's Journey and how Part One/Step One fits--it too was the CALL because the owls and the cats and the wizards came to call. In Chapter Two, we get the zoo, and there is the snake incident, reminiscent of the Greek Hercules tale, and we find other strange things happen to Haryr without him meaning itor knwoing why--let's identify and discuss them and how they set us up for more of what's to come.

In Chapter Three, there are Letters From No One. URGENT. It is cumulative:  this is a literary term that labels the technique of building momentum of action and of situation, or of repetitive events and phrases or other forms of repetitive speech. It builds: The letters, the number of them that accumulate, their urgency, it reminds us of the broom in Mickey Mouse with the Sorceror tale when the broom that is udner the spell to clean the house and get the buckets of water ready gets out of control; however, here, the wizards are in control but the urgency makes the magic take over like with the broom. The reader begins to anticipate more letters as the story goes along...as if the reader too is waiting for them. It sets us up on the edge of our seats and gets our attention just the way they are supposed to get Harry's attention but at first the Darsley's hide the letters until they just can't anymore, because there are so many they are filliong up the house. We begin here to really start identifying with Harry Potter, to feel his needs and his cause through this emotive process.

Later, the rest of the Hero's Journey steps in this story. The transition/bridge comes when he gets on the train between the worlds that takes him to Hogwart's. He is in a new world. He is on the Threshold. Now we readers are on the threshhold for the rest of the story to read about this new supernatural world! 

All for Now,

mBenci



Saturday, November 16, 2024

Why People Like Scary Stories

 


Image thanks to Clker-Free-Vector-Images from Pixabay

I think when the day is saved at the end of an end of the world disaster movie or armageddon film, there is great relief and then we thank our lucky stars we are still here! It is good to be able to say "not here not now."      

But then as for grade B horror films, sometimes I watch them because they can be so silly and humorous and sometimes I watch them because of the bizarre and/or gruesome image. The film industry got in trouble when TV could air movies so they had to make money making grade B sensational films. Is there anyone out there that doesn't want to see what The Blob looks like or The Mushroom People?      

But then I can't stand much that is a scary more-human image like zombies--I can't look at zombie depictions, whether ads or movies; I see them and run. For me the almost human scary image or alienated human state is too close for comfort.      

Yet, I do often write horror, but only the type of horror I can stand and not have gruesome nightmares about.     

See my library video on my website/Sandusky Library YouTube page on Hansel and Gretel and horror and why people like horror and what Stephen King has had to day about it! You can find the video on my website under MEdia and Videos or you can go directly to YouTube with this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMYMolUbiqQ...

Monday, November 11, 2024

The Witch of November



(Photo from Wikki)

Ahh, November10. My birthday, Neil Gaiman's birthday same day same year, he born just a few hours ahead of me, my astro bro. Then, fifteen years later the same day came "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald" when "the witch of November" comes, as it says in Gordon Lightfoot's song, as is said by the lake locals here--it is part of our folklore. I am a Great Lakes Girl (I mean 'Girl' with all due respect-- I was born on the Great Lakes and grew up on here and stayed my whole life here). The ship was on its way along the Great Lakes to Cleveland, where I was born, that fateful day, which was on my 15th birthday. And not the same year of course but my and the Marine Corps birthday are on the same day, Nov. 10. Very good day to be born, at18 degrees Scorpio if you know deep-dive (an overused phrase I can barely stand by now!) astrology and not just popular astrology. Here's that witchy song, link below.  

https://youtu.be/hgI8bta-7aw?si=-hZv6WATLlDUBQZs

My heart goes out to all those on the ship that went down. There is a sea captain who lives on the lake, who some of my friends know. who was on the Edmund Fitgerald many tmes before it ever sank  I hear he tells Great lake and sea stories. I hope to hear some someday. When I do I will see if he will give me permission to tell some to my readers.

.I was also aboard the HMS Bounty (of the Pirates of the Caribbean) one day, I forget hiw long it was then  before it sank in the hurricane in the Atlantic  and still have pics of me on it. 

I have posted and written about both these shipwrecks before on Facebook and other places. I tend to post or write something about it every year on my birthday. I can't seem to find on YouTube anymore the original video I used to post with the actual news footage in it that was not blurry in spots like this video is. Also I liked how at the end of the other one it showed the faces and brief writeups about each person on the ship that went down with it. 

Not everything about my birthday is gloomy, of course, but this does always give me a somber note to think about befoe my birthday festivities renew my celebration of life. 

And again,, Happy Birthday to one of my astrological Water Sign Scorpio soul mates Neil Gaiman. I admire his writings, his books, his storytelling. 

For images of the Edmund Fitgerald, go to https://www.freep.com/picture-gallery/news/local/2014/11/07/rare-
photos-edmund-fitzgerald/18642865/